Description: Judicial consensus is a consensus mechanism inspired by legal processes, where decisions are made based on the evidence and arguments presented. This approach seeks to ensure that decisions are fair and equitable, promoting transparency and the participation of the parties involved. In this context, judicial consensus is based on the idea that, just like in a trial, parties must present their arguments and evidence clearly and structured, allowing a group of judges or an automated system to evaluate the information and reach a conclusion. This method is applied not only in the legal field but also has found its place in distributed systems and blockchain technology, where the need to reach an agreement among multiple nodes is fundamental for the efficient and secure operation of the network. The relevance of judicial consensus lies in its ability to handle uncertainty and complexity in decision-making, ensuring that all relevant aspects are considered before reaching a resolution. Furthermore, it fosters a collaborative environment where parties can interact and contribute to the decision-making process, which can result in more robust solutions that are accepted by all involved.
