Description: The comparison of reinforcement learning algorithms in the context of AutoML involves a thorough evaluation of different approaches used to train agents that learn to make decisions through interaction with an environment. These algorithms, which include methods such as Q-learning, Deep Q-Networks (DQN), and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), are characterized by their ability to optimize action policies based on received rewards. The efficiency and performance of these algorithms are crucial, as they determine how quickly an agent can learn and adapt to new situations. In the realm of AutoML, where the automation of the modeling process is essential, selecting the right algorithm can significantly influence the quality of the generated models. The comparison is based on metrics such as convergence rate, stability, and generalization capability, allowing researchers and developers to identify the most suitable approach for specific tasks. Furthermore, implementing these algorithms in AutoML environments can facilitate the creation of more robust and efficient models, thereby optimizing the time and resources needed for developing AI-based solutions.
