Description: Sprint review is a fundamental meeting within agile methodologies, especially in Scrum. It takes place at the end of each sprint, which is a defined work period, typically lasting between one to four weeks. During this meeting, the development team presents the completed work to stakeholders and the Product Owner. The main objective is to review what has been achieved in the sprint and gather feedback on the developed product. This review not only focuses on the results but also allows for identifying areas for improvement in the work process. The meeting fosters collaboration and communication among all team members and stakeholders, ensuring everyone is aligned with the project’s goals. Additionally, it serves as an opportunity to celebrate achievements and recognize the team’s efforts. The sprint review is a key component for continuous improvement, as it allows for adjusting focus and priorities based on the feedback received, contributing to a more efficient and effective development of the final product.
History: Sprint review originated with the creation of the Scrum framework in the 1990s. Scrum was developed by Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber as a response to the limitations of traditional project management approaches. As Scrum gained popularity, the sprint review became established as an essential practice to foster transparency and collaboration in software development. Over time, this practice has adapted and evolved, integrating into various agile methodologies beyond Scrum.
Uses: Sprint review is primarily used in agile software development, where rapid adaptation to changes and continuous improvement of the product are sought. It is applied in teams using Scrum but can also be adapted by other agile frameworks. Its use allows teams to receive direct feedback from stakeholders, adjust the project’s course, and ensure that the final product meets customer expectations.
Examples: An example of a sprint review could be a development team that, at the end of a sprint, presents a new feature to stakeholders. During the meeting, team members demonstrate how the feature works and gather feedback on its usability and effectiveness. Based on this feedback, the team can decide to make adjustments in the next iteration of development.
